FIRST AMENDMENT PETITION FOR REDRESS OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION AND THEIR OATHS OF OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA…
What we have here is a warning to all South Dakota’s Conservatives…
The GOP members of our Legislature would appear to siding with Democrats in an attempt to silence or purge any and all Conservative voices in this state. In moments Julie was accused, convicted, unceremoniously stripped of her Committee positions and threatened with expulsion. Without Due Process. Without an accuser to confront and question. Without an opportunity to self defense. You know who else does this? DC Democrats, people who wish to achieve absolute tyranny and those questing for complete hegmonic domination. King George once refused his Assent to Law, Neglected Law, denied our Right of Representation and used these infringements to Fatigue the Populace into submission. How is this situation any different than the actions of King George?
There has yet to be any proof of any of the requirements for removal from office in accordance with SD Codified L § 3-17-6 (2014) 3-17-6. Grounds for removal of local officers from office. Any officer of any local unit of government may be charged, tried, and removed from office for misconduct, malfeasance, nonfeasance, crimes in office, drunkenness, gross incompetency, corruption, theft, oppression, or gross partiality.
A “fair hearing” has been scheduled and the Committee appointed against her is a heavy majority of people who have already voted to remove her. Those positioned against Julie are Owning the Judges against her and they appear to be using a Mock Trial citing Pretend Offences to protect their positions in Pierre and Gerrymander the process against Conservative voices.
To the best of my knowledge there has been no sworn statements made against Julie for engaging in any behaviors listed in South Dakota Codified Law that would merit removal from office. She has committed no misconduct, malfeasance or nonfeasance. She has not committed any crimes, been drunk in office or ever shown any level of incompetence or any of the other listed possible charges. In the last few years we have seen some Representatives that have violated some portions of the Codified Law they’re wielding against Julie and they are standing against her wielding hypocritical righteousness as Mercenaries against the people of District 30.
I get the feeling the only “infraction” she has committed is being a strong outspoken Representative for her constituents in a district of the second largest population center in South Dakota which is a district that is heavily populated with Conservatives that have had enough of having their voices silenced because they won’t toe the demanded lines. A large majority of which have walked away from both the state and national GOP because they, like Democrats infringe on our unalienable rights to Life, Liberty and our pursuit of Happiness.
The majority of outlets that have published articles on this debacle have cited “Anti-Vaccine speech” as a reason for this heavy handed silencing of Julie. Therefore this becomes a topic which must be discussed both for and against Julie.
Has there been a 4070% increase of miscarriages and stillbirths since the implementation of the Covid 19 vaccine programs? YES! Are embalmers and Morticians finding a large amount of synthetic clots that are not blood clots in the circulatory systems of the deceased bodies they handle? YES! Are pre-teen children experiencing heart attacks and strokes and dying? YES! Are doctors seeing heart attacks in fetuses? YES! Are large numbers of top tier athletes dropping dead on sports fields around the world? YES!
Putting Julie on trial for ‘Anti-Vax” speak requires that you also put the vaccines on trial. If you can not prove her wrong you can not sanction her for “Anti-Vax” speak. You can get an hour plus of evidence here, but sadly 95% will never look at the evidence stacked for the need of “Anti-Vax” speak. Too many believe that governments and worldwide bad actors would never do that to them and therefore it could never exist. Celebrities from Bill Nye, Steven Colbert, Tom Hanks and Bill Gates will openly celebrate Maltheusean Theory that population must be controlled to ensure there are enough resources remaining for all citizens of the world. This theory ties into Eugenics which requires the reduction of “lesser” humans as determined by the Elites of the world. You can see it in practice if you wish to open your eyes and look. There was a heavy push for some of the poorest population centers and Reservations to be incentivised with cash to get vaccines and boosters.
We have reached a point where every single one of us must decide if we are with We The People or those who wish to seize control of the only truly free nation on this planet and end freedom in this world. Do you want to set the precedent that evidence is not needed to prosecute those who speak out and defend the rights and freedoms of their constituents? Just try to remember, when you set such a dangerous precedent, it can and will be applied to you when you feel the need to speak out of turn or against the status quo. Will you side with the censors who silence people who bring this evidence to the debate? Will you affirm that we as humans have a right to not be poisoned by mandate?
The ball is in your court… choose wisely. Feel free to share this opinionated document.
Patrick W. Schubert Sr.
1157 Beadle Court
Box Elder, SD 57719
Frye-Mueller vs “The Establishment”
A Movie Review of “2000 Mules”, by Patrick W. Schubert Sr.
Letter to The Editor- A Response to Voter Suppression Article